Talk:nearestObject id

From Bohemia Interactive Community

I doubt that the 2nd example fits in here, as it is an example for nearestObject (type). BTW, do we really need the separate nearestObject type page, as the type syntax is also mentioned in the nearestObject article.

--raedor 23:57, 1 November 2006 (CET)

The point ot the whole thing is:

This whole list of commands is based on the command list supplied by BI.

Where they have supplied more than one version of a command, it has been echoed accordingly.

Until someone, in their infinite wisdom has decided that more than one variation of a command can be dealt with in one single definition, not always successfully in my opinion.

Or, indeed until the Template was applied and a lot of information went down the plughole.

This is why you see what seems to be duplicates, it is because it has been copied faithfully from the original list, until the Wiki went public it was fine.

Planck 00:21, 2 November 2006 (CET)

I like the idea of the disambiguous page. For instance nearestObject pointing to id and type. This way its easy to find and less confusing then the combining the commands into a single article.But maybe thats wrong since that command exists as well. hoz 01:22, 2 November 2006 (CET)