Talkingtoaj – User talk
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Killzone Kid (talk | contribs) (→getRelPos: new section) |
(→getRelPos: RE:KK) |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
Could you please clarify your note you posted on getRelPos. At the moment it sounds like that getPos and getRelPos do the same thing only getPos can also take position. Thsi is incorrect and the reason getRelPos doesnt take array as position is because the direction is calculated 'relative' to the current object direction, which obviously not how getPos works. Could you please either expand or remove your note. [[User:Killzone Kid|Killzone Kid]] ([[User talk:Killzone Kid|talk]]) 17:16, 3 March 2016 (CET) | Could you please clarify your note you posted on getRelPos. At the moment it sounds like that getPos and getRelPos do the same thing only getPos can also take position. Thsi is incorrect and the reason getRelPos doesnt take array as position is because the direction is calculated 'relative' to the current object direction, which obviously not how getPos works. Could you please either expand or remove your note. [[User:Killzone Kid|Killzone Kid]] ([[User talk:Killzone Kid|talk]]) 17:16, 3 March 2016 (CET) | ||
:technically he is not wrong if you go<code>bob [[getRelPos]] [0,0];</code> which is equal to <code>[[getPos]] bob;</code> change the distance parameter on [[getRelPos]] and all bets are off. Doing so would be pointless and yes his not is VERY misleading. He makes it sound like BI added a useless command when in fact it is very useful. Not to long ago I needed a command that does exactly this instead of trying to write a function. --[[User:Benargee|Benargee]] ([[User talk:Benargee|talk]]) 03:41, 4 March 2016 (CET) | |||
Revision as of 03:41, 4 March 2016
I'm a bit confused. What exactly is the purpose of Stryker ICV (M2) and Stryker ICV (MK19)? The vehicles themselves should be covered somewhere here and here -- Manny 16:19, 13 May 2007 (CEST)
getRelPos
Could you please clarify your note you posted on getRelPos. At the moment it sounds like that getPos and getRelPos do the same thing only getPos can also take position. Thsi is incorrect and the reason getRelPos doesnt take array as position is because the direction is calculated 'relative' to the current object direction, which obviously not how getPos works. Could you please either expand or remove your note. Killzone Kid (talk) 17:16, 3 March 2016 (CET)
- technically he is not wrong if you go
bob getRelPos [0,0];which is equal togetPos bob;change the distance parameter on getRelPos and all bets are off. Doing so would be pointless and yes his not is VERY misleading. He makes it sound like BI added a useless command when in fact it is very useful. Not to long ago I needed a command that does exactly this instead of trying to write a function. --Benargee (talk) 03:41, 4 March 2016 (CET)