BTS Instructions – Talk
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (Confirmed) |
|||
| Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
What does "confirmed" realy mean? Some people think it is something like Acknowledged, I think it is when fix is verified and the bug is confirmed to be fixed, therefore the bug is ready to be closed. --[[User:Suma|Suma]] 16:38, 19 March 2007 (CET) | What does "confirmed" realy mean? Some people think it is something like Acknowledged, I think it is when fix is verified and the bug is confirmed to be fixed, therefore the bug is ready to be closed. --[[User:Suma|Suma]] 16:38, 19 March 2007 (CET) | ||
: That depends how you'll like to use it. There is nice summary [http://mantisbt.org/manual/manual.page.descriptions.system.management.pages.manage.configuration.workflow.transitions.php here]. I quoted it [http://www.flashpoint1985.com/cgi-bin/ikonboard311/ikonboard.cgi?s=0b8703e37632b5d5ca06a4ffa1ceea88&act=ST&f=75&t=59201&st=&&#entry1020416 recently]: | |||
::''We use 'acknowledged' to confirm that a new issues has been reviewed and that it is indeed a bug and that it contains enough information to be reproduced/analysed. However, at this time we will not start work on it.'' | |||
::''Once we start a new release and the issue needs to be addressed (in this release), its status will change to 'confirmed'. '' .... | |||
:--[[User:Boecko|Boecko]] 17:03, 19 March 2007 (CET) | |||
Revision as of 17:03, 19 March 2007
Link on Bugtracker page
I've linked this page on http://bugs.armed-assault.net/main_page.php --Boecko 22:57, 16 February 2007 (CET)
Severity
What are we going to do with the "Severity" option? Will this be handled as it is now, that regular reporters only file it under a default status, and then a sysop will assign it a priority (that's how I documented it for now)?
And I guess we will have to adjust our current priorities to the new classes. --Kronzky 20:19, 17 February 2007 (CET)
- Priorities adjusted. Severity should be adjusted by sysops, as also priority. --raedor 13:46, 9 March 2007 (CET)
- shouldn't we integrate the priorities on BTS Guidelines --Boecko 13:00, 12 March 2007 (CET)
- We should, yes. ;) --raedor 21:40, 13 March 2007 (CET)
Confirmed
What does "confirmed" realy mean? Some people think it is something like Acknowledged, I think it is when fix is verified and the bug is confirmed to be fixed, therefore the bug is ready to be closed. --Suma 16:38, 19 March 2007 (CET)
- That depends how you'll like to use it. There is nice summary here. I quoted it recently:
- We use 'acknowledged' to confirm that a new issues has been reviewed and that it is indeed a bug and that it contains enough information to be reproduced/analysed. However, at this time we will not start work on it.
- Once we start a new release and the issue needs to be addressed (in this release), its status will change to 'confirmed'. ....
- --Boecko 17:03, 19 March 2007 (CET)