Extensions – Talk
(Added comment) |
m (→Page review - consideration: Fixed author stamp style) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Page review - consideration == | == Page review - consideration == | ||
Hello, | Hello, | ||
| Line 12: | Line 9: | ||
The idea of an official GIT is a good idea but list of contributors must be shared. However, currently as this git is owned by only 1 contributor and maintained by no one, it is useless. | The idea of an official GIT is a good idea but list of contributors must be shared. However, currently as this git is owned by only 1 contributor and maintained by no one, it is useless. | ||
[[User:code34|code34]] ([[User talk:code34|talk]]) 13:28, 16 June 2018 (CEST) | |||
:I am not quite sure where the previous versions have been more explicit about the security risk. Could you provide examples? The current version just took what was in there before and cleaned it up from useless "advices" and gets straigth to the point. Also, i would not be up for "move the FAQ to a separate page", for me both should stay here simply because it is stuff that concerns those who look here for user-help and those who come here for dev-help. [[User:x39|x39]] ([[User talk:x39|talk]]) 15:52, 16 June 2018 (CEST) | :I am not quite sure where the previous versions have been more explicit about the security risk. Could you provide examples? The current version just took what was in there before and cleaned it up from useless "advices" and gets straigth to the point. Also, i would not be up for "move the FAQ to a separate page", for me both should stay here simply because it is stuff that concerns those who look here for user-help and those who come here for dev-help. [[User:x39|x39]] ([[User talk:x39|talk]]) 15:52, 16 June 2018 (CEST) | ||
Revision as of 15:54, 16 June 2018
Page review - consideration
Hello,
I would like a major revision of this page. To output all code implementation examples, move them to an official GIT and replace them with a pseudo code.
I would also like the FAQ regarding the use of extensions to be separate from the extension development part. Previous versions were also much more explicit about security risks.
The major part of the article must describes the interfaces and how to implement them in a generic way so as not to fit in the case of each language. It is better to learn to fish rather than bring the fish into the hands of the developers.
The idea of an official GIT is a good idea but list of contributors must be shared. However, currently as this git is owned by only 1 contributor and maintained by no one, it is useless. code34 (talk) 13:28, 16 June 2018 (CEST)
- I am not quite sure where the previous versions have been more explicit about the security risk. Could you provide examples? The current version just took what was in there before and cleaned it up from useless "advices" and gets straigth to the point. Also, i would not be up for "move the FAQ to a separate page", for me both should stay here simply because it is stuff that concerns those who look here for user-help and those who come here for dev-help. x39 (talk) 15:52, 16 June 2018 (CEST)