a = b – Talk
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
mNo edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
:::No, Planck didn't confuse this with a == b, I was just at a loss as to where this command comes from as it isn't really in the comref. Anyway the latest definition is fine. [[User:Planck|Planck]] 22:43, 16 December 2006 (CET) | :::No, Planck didn't confuse this with a == b, I was just at a loss as to where this command comes from as it isn't really in the comref. Anyway the latest definition is fine. [[User:Planck|Planck]] 22:43, 16 December 2006 (CET) | ||
Note that array1=array2; array2=[1,2,3]; makes array1=[1,2,3] as well since it's more like a "pointer", not a copy of. array1=+array2 *is* a copy. Confused? :) --[[User:Doolittle|Doolittle]] 18:44, 8 July 2007 (CEST) | |||
Revision as of 18:44, 8 July 2007
I thought "Equals a to b" is clearer, as it shows that it is an active process, as "a equals b" sounds more like a comparison. But I'm neither a native speaker nor is this command that unclear ;) --raedor 17:51, 16 December 2006 (CET)
- How about this one: Assigns content of b to variable a.. That should be pretty obvious to anybody, what it means. --Kronzky 18:08, 16 December 2006 (CET)
- I think planck confused a = b and a == b. I agree with Kronzky, the new definition is much more clearer. --Sniperwolf572 18:16, 16 December 2006 (CET)
- I can live with that one. :) --raedor 19:27, 16 December 2006 (CET)
- No, Planck didn't confuse this with a == b, I was just at a loss as to where this command comes from as it isn't really in the comref. Anyway the latest definition is fine. Planck 22:43, 16 December 2006 (CET)
Note that array1=array2; array2=[1,2,3]; makes array1=[1,2,3] as well since it's more like a "pointer", not a copy of. array1=+array2 *is* a copy. Confused? :) --Doolittle 18:44, 8 July 2007 (CEST)