remoteExecCall – Talk
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
Killzone Kid (talk | contribs) (→Discussion page: new section) |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
Also requestet by KK at the talkpage from Richardbiely here [[User_talk:Richardbiely]] (remoteexeccall return) - [[User:Will]] | Also requestet by KK at the talkpage from Richardbiely here [[User_talk:Richardbiely]] (remoteexeccall return) - [[User:Will]] | ||
::What? Who is supposed to be getting this return? The one who broadcast the function, or the one receiving it? KK was only asking for a local return. That way it would behave the same as [[call]] on the broadcaster's computer and in SP. Please elaborate on your question. --[[User:Benargee|Benargee]] ([[User talk:Benargee|talk]]) 22:29, 5 July 2015 (CEST) | ::What? Who is supposed to be getting this return? The one who broadcast the function, or the one receiving it? KK was only asking for a local return. That way it would behave the same as [[call]] on the broadcaster's computer and in SP. Please elaborate on your question. --[[User:Benargee|Benargee]] ([[User talk:Benargee|talk]]) 22:29, 5 July 2015 (CEST) | ||
== Discussion page == | |||
http://forums.bistudio.com/showthread.php?192496-Remote-Execution-Enhancements | |||
Revision as of 23:05, 5 July 2015
return like a normal Call
Why not instead of return a empty string return the return of the remote function. So i need a publicVar and a publicvarEventhandler or another script which get the result... Also requestet by KK at the talkpage from Richardbiely here User_talk:Richardbiely (remoteexeccall return) - User:Will
- What? Who is supposed to be getting this return? The one who broadcast the function, or the one receiving it? KK was only asking for a local return. That way it would behave the same as call on the broadcaster's computer and in SP. Please elaborate on your question. --Benargee (talk) 22:29, 5 July 2015 (CEST)
Discussion page
http://forums.bistudio.com/showthread.php?192496-Remote-Execution-Enhancements