STOVL – ArmA: Armed Assault Talk

Hi Frederf

I have been editing your text to make it more formal and adding in a few bits to aid in readability also some formating such as bold text and bullet points. We need to sought the pictures too.

Information overkill?

There is a lot of information presented within the article that has little or nothing to do with STOVL, for instance all those checklists - consider putting those in seperate articles. Also, the images are way too big and should be embedded as thumbnails. I do not mean to offend the author(s), but the article's current state is highly unreadable. -- Manny 13:35, 23 April 2007 (CEST)

Beggars can't be choosers... ;)

I'd MUCH rather have an article that goes a bit overboard in the detail, than not have an article at all. And since everybody is free to just skip the parts they don't need, I don't really see a problem in having too much detail. --Kronzky 05:45, 30 April 2007 (CEST)

True, but we should at least consider seperating the article for the moment. The section "Harrier Takeoff/Landing Simple Flight Demo" does not even make use of STOVL as far as I can tell :-/ -- Manny 12:40, 30 April 2007 (CEST)