addEventHandler – Talk
mNo edit summary |
m (Forgive me for butting in...) |
||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
: You've got a point there, and of course it will be some work. But, for a start, I have already written conversions of half of the OFP commands, which you can see at the [http://ofp.gamepark.cz/_hosted/hardrock/docu/ScriptRef/ Scripting Reference (unfinished)]. As the whole layout was made using a PHP parser, I could easily write a new parser which would output each command in the syntax needed for [[Template:Command]]. So, at least for these commands, it would be only copy-paste. What do you think about it? --[[User:Hardrock|hardrock]] 21:28, 31 July 2006 (CEST) | : You've got a point there, and of course it will be some work. But, for a start, I have already written conversions of half of the OFP commands, which you can see at the [http://ofp.gamepark.cz/_hosted/hardrock/docu/ScriptRef/ Scripting Reference (unfinished)]. As the whole layout was made using a PHP parser, I could easily write a new parser which would output each command in the syntax needed for [[Template:Command]]. So, at least for these commands, it would be only copy-paste. What do you think about it? --[[User:Hardrock|hardrock]] 21:28, 31 July 2006 (CEST) | ||
== Forgive me for butting in... == | |||
From what I understand, HardRock has been working on this and has several commands done already??? | |||
Even so, I would very much like to see an expansion of the current (i.e. default) command information. The original format goes back 6 years and was useful at the time, but from what I remember, took a very long time to fully understand what a single command even meant in regards to SP, MP, or even in-relation to other commands. OFPEC's comments on the comref were a good idea and this takes it up a whole new level. I would be happy to support a reference like this. | |||
Sincerely, | |||
CrashDome | |||
Revision as of 20:29, 31 July 2006
I talked to hoz and he meant I should post an example of how the new Template: Command would look in reality. Here is what you would get of the given source code. Any comments please? Use it for the rest of the commands? Alter it? --hardrock 20:40, 31 July 2006 (CEST)
It looks very good, a nice clear layout. I must admit though.......won't it be a lot of work to convert all the commands to this layout.
I'm not afraid of doing it, but I have been through these commands about five times now, for various changes.
Must admit it looks good though.
Planck 21:18, 31 July 2006 (CEST)
- You've got a point there, and of course it will be some work. But, for a start, I have already written conversions of half of the OFP commands, which you can see at the Scripting Reference (unfinished). As the whole layout was made using a PHP parser, I could easily write a new parser which would output each command in the syntax needed for Template:Command. So, at least for these commands, it would be only copy-paste. What do you think about it? --hardrock 21:28, 31 July 2006 (CEST)
Forgive me for butting in...
From what I understand, HardRock has been working on this and has several commands done already???
Even so, I would very much like to see an expansion of the current (i.e. default) command information. The original format goes back 6 years and was useful at the time, but from what I remember, took a very long time to fully understand what a single command even meant in regards to SP, MP, or even in-relation to other commands. OFPEC's comments on the comref were a good idea and this takes it up a whole new level. I would be happy to support a reference like this.
Sincerely, CrashDome