Operation Flashpoint: Multiplayer Squads – Category talk
mNo edit summary |
mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 24: | Line 24: | ||
---- | ---- | ||
Noone ever gets to that list. | |||
There is currently alot of duplication with clans that are in both. | |||
When you click the TOC links you get to the top index, not the bottom one. | |||
--[[User:Salisan|Salisan]] 12:10, 3 August 2006 (CEST) | |||
I have to disagree, there is no duplication. | I have to disagree, there is no duplication. | ||
Any that were in the top list, that were also in the article list were removed some days ago. | Any that were in the top list, that were also in the article list were removed some days ago. | ||
If any reappear I simply remove them again | |||
[[User:Planck|Planck]] 12:35, 5 August 2006 (CEST) | [[User:Planck|Planck]] 12:35, 5 August 2006 (CEST) | ||
Revision as of 11:36, 5 August 2006
Wouldn't a UN-flag be more appropriate for a international squad? Mahlkav 14:39, 31 July 2006 (CEST)
Please only add to the top listing of links to Squad sites if there is no BI Wiki page for the Squad.
Planck 16:56, 31 July 2006 (CEST)
Is there any good way we can give the squads with wiki pages equal exposure as those who just link their homepage?
The wiki way should be rewarded a bit i think.. Right now they're very hard to find, and that's bad since this is a category. --Salisan 11:52, 3 August 2006 (CEST)
I have no idea what you mean.
The squads with a wiki page are listed in the list of Category articles at the bottom of the page.
How much more exposure do they need?
Planck 12:06, 3 August 2006 (CEST)
Noone ever gets to that list. There is currently alot of duplication with clans that are in both. When you click the TOC links you get to the top index, not the bottom one.
--Salisan 12:10, 3 August 2006 (CEST)
I have to disagree, there is no duplication.
Any that were in the top list, that were also in the article list were removed some days ago.
If any reappear I simply remove them again
Planck 12:35, 5 August 2006 (CEST)