ERRORS – Category talk
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(error details) |
mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
:I'm not quite sure ''why'' those four articles were put into the Errors category. | :I'm not quite sure ''why'' those four articles were put into the Errors category. | ||
:As far as the "details unspecified" in the error box is concerned - that shows up if no error description is given in the errors template. Perhaps we should rephrase that to avoid confusion. --[[User:Kronzky|Kronzky]] 04:00, 13 August 2006 (CEST) | :As far as the "details unspecified" in the error box is concerned - that shows up if no error description is given in the errors template. Perhaps we should rephrase that to avoid confusion. --[[User:Kronzky|Kronzky]] 04:00, 13 August 2006 (CEST) | ||
:I just rephrased the message to ''"error details unspecified"''. Hope that'll make it a bit clearer. | |||
:And if I read the history right, it seems that Hoz classified them as faulty. We might want to check with him, why... [[User:Kronzky|Kronzky]] | |||
Revision as of 04:13, 13 August 2006
Isn't that the same as a stub? --raedor 22:13, 12 August 2006 (CEST)
- I'm not quite sure why those four articles were put into the Errors category.
- As far as the "details unspecified" in the error box is concerned - that shows up if no error description is given in the errors template. Perhaps we should rephrase that to avoid confusion. --Kronzky 04:00, 13 August 2006 (CEST)
- I just rephrased the message to "error details unspecified". Hope that'll make it a bit clearer.
- And if I read the history right, it seems that Hoz classified them as faulty. We might want to check with him, why... Kronzky