Vic – User talk
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
mNo edit summary |
mNo edit summary |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
It is important to sign the comments. Not only as it is written in the guidelines you hopefully read, you can also see easily who's just spamming and if there's an important bug it is easier to contact the guy who found it. As a last point, it is not a good idea to revert changes made by a wiki sysop. | It is important to sign the comments. Not only as it is written in the guidelines you hopefully read, you can also see easily who's just spamming and if there's an important bug it is easier to contact the guy who found it. As a last point, it is not a good idea to revert changes made by a wiki sysop. | ||
--[[User:Raedor|raedor]] 01:05, 5 December 2006 (CET) | --[[User:Raedor|raedor]] 01:05, 5 December 2006 (CET) | ||
:Everything's clear then. And no, I don't hate you. I updated my user page, so that everyone can see I'm not a vandal ;) --[[User:Raedor|raedor]] 01:44, 5 December 2006 (CET) | |||
:Erm, one more note: You're right about the guidelines (that it refers to Talk pages only). Above you see the arguments why we've written it on the content page in this case ;) Oh, and if you're seeing (true) vandalism again: it's very welcome if you remove it :) --[[User:Raedor|raedor]] 01:48, 5 December 2006 (CET) | |||
Latest revision as of 01:48, 5 December 2006
It is important to sign the comments. Not only as it is written in the guidelines you hopefully read, you can also see easily who's just spamming and if there's an important bug it is easier to contact the guy who found it. As a last point, it is not a good idea to revert changes made by a wiki sysop. --raedor 01:05, 5 December 2006 (CET)
- Everything's clear then. And no, I don't hate you. I updated my user page, so that everyone can see I'm not a vandal ;) --raedor 01:44, 5 December 2006 (CET)
- Erm, one more note: You're right about the guidelines (that it refers to Talk pages only). Above you see the arguments why we've written it on the content page in this case ;) Oh, and if you're seeing (true) vandalism again: it's very welcome if you remove it :) --raedor 01:48, 5 December 2006 (CET)