Scripting Reference – Talk
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 26: | Line 26: | ||
--[[User:Suma|Suma]] 15:07, 19 April 2006 (CEST) | --[[User:Suma|Suma]] 15:07, 19 April 2006 (CEST) | ||
----- | |||
Ok, that sounds fair enough. :) | Ok, that sounds fair enough. :) | ||
Planck | Planck |
Revision as of 14:42, 19 April 2006
Each scripting command should be properly categorized to make navigation easier. I suggest following categories:
Category:Scripting Commands Each scripting command goes here
Category:Scripting Commands OFP 1.97 If command is available in OFP 1.97, it goes here.
Category:Scripting Commands OFP 1.46 If command is available in OFP 1.46, it goes here.
Category:Scripting Commands ArmA If command is available in ArmA, it goes here.
Note: one command can (and most often will) be present in more categories.
I have implemented this in one article to show how it can be done: count
Once those categories are implemented, the page Scripting Reference could be deleted or it could be replaced by links to corresponding categories.
Making the list for OFP up to version 1.46 and a list for OFP up to version 1.97 won't be too difficult, however, making a list for ArmA will be difficult, as we have no access to such a list, nor the definitions of new commands and relevant changes to old commands.
If we had such a list we might manage that better ;)
Planck
Off course, I assume nobody outside BIS can make sure ArmA list is accurate. A good starting point could be to assume all 1.97 commands are still present in ArmA. We will add new commands and remove obsolete ones later on.
--Suma 15:07, 19 April 2006 (CEST)
Ok, that sounds fair enough. :)
Planck