exitWith – Talk
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Lou Montana (talk | contribs) m (Text replacement - " <dd class="notedate">" to " <dt><dt> <dd class="notedate">") |
m (removed misleading note.) |
||
Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
::<code>for "_j" from 1 to 10 do <br> {<br> player sideChat format["%1",_j];<br> if (_j==5) exitWith {player sideChat "5 is enough"};<br> };<br> player sideChat "Complete";</code> | ::<code>for "_j" from 1 to 10 do <br> {<br> player sideChat format["%1",_j];<br> if (_j==5) exitWith {player sideChat "5 is enough"};<br> };<br> player sideChat "Complete";</code> | ||
::--[[User:Kronzky|Kronzky]] 16:37, 7 May 2007 (CEST) | ::--[[User:Kronzky|Kronzky]] 16:37, 7 May 2007 (CEST) | ||
Revision as of 17:48, 9 August 2021
It seems this command exits the current "scope" (is this the correct term?), rather than the current script file. Is this correct?
Example code, started using execVM:
<stuff> for "_j" from 1 to _value do { <stuff> if (<exit condition>) exitWith {player sideChat "Cancelled"}; }; player sideChat "Complete";
If the exit condition is true, both sideChats are executed. Any comments? Or am I just stating the obvious? :) --Ceeeb 10:04, 7 May 2007 (CEST)
- Seems so, yes. Good find. --raedor 12:33, 7 May 2007 (CEST)
- Yes, it only exits the current level (or "block" or "scope" or whatever). So that behaviour would be expected.
- Do this, for example, and it should become a bit more obvious:
for "_j" from 1 to 10 do
{
player sideChat format["%1",_j];
if (_j==5) exitWith {player sideChat "5 is enough"};
};
player sideChat "Complete";- --Kronzky 16:37, 7 May 2007 (CEST)