processInitCommands – Talk
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
mNo edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
:: Yes, 2.33 is correct here. --[[User:Suma|Suma]] 12:34, 29 September 2006 (CEST) | :: Yes, 2.33 is correct here. --[[User:Suma|Suma]] 12:34, 29 September 2006 (CEST) | ||
:::2.33? What does that mean? Also, it seems like people are using this command incorrectly all over the known universe!! Why are people having the server createVehicles, then setVehicleInit them, then run processInitCommands right after??? Isn't the idea/approach to setVehicleInit and then have the ''client'' run processInitCommands when they connect AFTER the fact. Any clients that are CURRENTLY connected will need to run something else for the object that was created. Thoughts? --[[User:Doolittle|Doolittle]] 20:44, 2 August 2007 (CEST) | |||
Revision as of 19:44, 2 August 2007
According to the comref the version of this command is 1.33.
Unless you have updated information and haven't just guessed that it should be 2.33. We can all make assumptions, but it might be safer to ask BI.
Planck 13:47, 21 August 2006 (CEST)
- Yes, 2.33 is correct here. --Suma 12:34, 29 September 2006 (CEST)
- 2.33? What does that mean? Also, it seems like people are using this command incorrectly all over the known universe!! Why are people having the server createVehicles, then setVehicleInit them, then run processInitCommands right after??? Isn't the idea/approach to setVehicleInit and then have the client run processInitCommands when they connect AFTER the fact. Any clients that are CURRENTLY connected will need to run something else for the object that was created. Thoughts? --Doolittle 20:44, 2 August 2007 (CEST)
- Yes, 2.33 is correct here. --Suma 12:34, 29 September 2006 (CEST)