Group – Talk
m (→units) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
I suspect that since a Group is an [[Array]] of identical [[Object]] types, then any command working on those kind of arrays ([[Array|Units]] eg) or Groups, work on both | I suspect that since a Group is an [[Array]] of identical [[Object]] types, then any command working on those kind of arrays ([[Array|Units]] eg) or Groups, work on both | ||
This article seems very incorrect to me. A group data type is NOT an array of units! It is a different data type entirely! I've made some rudimentary changes to the article to reflect this. Also, we shouldn't have some fuzzy wording like "any command working on those types of arrays work on both". Either a command works on a group, or it doesn't. This information should be documented within the command itself. We aren't helping anyone by making fuzzy distinctions. The engine doesn't operate on fuzzy. It operates on clear-cut. | |||
--[[User:General Barron|General Barron]] 02:48, 18 February 2009 (CET) | |||
Revision as of 02:48, 18 February 2009
Does anyone know how many groups a side can possibly have? I figured out something around 140.
units
I suspect that since a Group is an Array of identical Object types, then any command working on those kind of arrays (Units eg) or Groups, work on both
This article seems very incorrect to me. A group data type is NOT an array of units! It is a different data type entirely! I've made some rudimentary changes to the article to reflect this. Also, we shouldn't have some fuzzy wording like "any command working on those types of arrays work on both". Either a command works on a group, or it doesn't. This information should be documented within the command itself. We aren't helping anyone by making fuzzy distinctions. The engine doesn't operate on fuzzy. It operates on clear-cut.
--General Barron 02:48, 18 February 2009 (CET)