Operation Flashpoint: Addons – Category talk
(Categories) |
mNo edit summary |
||
| (5 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
[[User:Hoz|hoz]] 20:49, 18 July 2006 (CEST) | [[User:Hoz|hoz]] 20:49, 18 July 2006 (CEST) | ||
----- | |||
Can't see why we wouldn't do it. | |||
Categories are great. | |||
--[[User:Salisan|Salisan]] 18:36, 19 July 2006 (CEST) | |||
== Categories == | == Categories == | ||
| Line 14: | Line 21: | ||
Could/should we add a category 'Translations' here?<br> | Could/should we add a category 'Translations' here?<br> | ||
After all, you can't make an add-on without knowing the Czech names ([http://community.bistudio.com/wiki/Kronzky%27s_Sandbox sandbox])<br>--[[User:Kronzky|Kronzky]] 18:34, 19 July 2006 (CEST) | After all, you can't make an add-on without knowing the Czech names ([http://community.bistudio.com/wiki/Kronzky%27s_Sandbox sandbox])<br>--[[User:Kronzky|Kronzky]] 18:34, 19 July 2006 (CEST) | ||
---- | |||
That's only needed for OFP Addons, as in ArmA you can define eg memory point names in the config ([[CfgVehicles_Config_Reference#memoryPointExhaust...]]). | |||
--[[User:Raedor|raedor]] 18:37, 19 July 2006 (CEST) | |||
--- | |||
But this <i>is</i> the OFP Addon page... ArmA has its own Addon page: [[:Category:Armed Assault: Addons|Armed Assault: Addons]]. So shouldn't we include it here?<br>(Since the categories are protected I can't add it myself.)<br>--[[User:Kronzky|Kronzky]] 18:58, 19 July 2006 (CEST) | |||
: Yes, this is OFP. But a new category is independent from this page. Why not make a "normal" page out of your sandbox (eg Czech Translations) and add it to this category? --[[User:Raedor|raedor]] 19:03, 19 July 2006 (CEST) | |||
Latest revision as of 18:04, 19 July 2006
addons mods
Could we create some sub-categories here (like 'Mods', 'Islands', 'Units', etc.)?
Otherwise everybody will just use the main page to advertise his own addon, and it'll get cluttered with thousands of listings.
We are discussing that now, and we will be creating seperate pages for each.
hoz 20:49, 18 July 2006 (CEST)
Can't see why we wouldn't do it. Categories are great.
--Salisan 18:36, 19 July 2006 (CEST)
Categories
Could/should we add a category 'Translations' here?
After all, you can't make an add-on without knowing the Czech names (sandbox)
--Kronzky 18:34, 19 July 2006 (CEST)
That's only needed for OFP Addons, as in ArmA you can define eg memory point names in the config (CfgVehicles_Config_Reference#memoryPointExhaust...).
--raedor 18:37, 19 July 2006 (CEST)
---
But this is the OFP Addon page... ArmA has its own Addon page: Armed Assault: Addons. So shouldn't we include it here?
(Since the categories are protected I can't add it myself.)
--Kronzky 18:58, 19 July 2006 (CEST)
- Yes, this is OFP. But a new category is independent from this page. Why not make a "normal" page out of your sandbox (eg Czech Translations) and add it to this category? --raedor 19:03, 19 July 2006 (CEST)