exitWith – Talk
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
mNo edit summary |
Lou Montana (talk | contribs) m (Text replacement - "<code>" to "<code style="display: block">") |
||
(9 intermediate revisions by 6 users not shown) | |||
Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
If the exit condition is true, both sideChats are executed. Any comments? Or am I just stating the obvious? :) --[[User:Ceeeb|Ceeeb]] 10:04, 7 May 2007 (CEST) | If the exit condition is true, both sideChats are executed. Any comments? Or am I just stating the obvious? :) --[[User:Ceeeb|Ceeeb]] 10:04, 7 May 2007 (CEST) | ||
:Seems so, yes. Good find. --[[User:Raedor|raedor]] 12:33, 7 May 2007 (CEST) | |||
::Yes, it only exits the ''current level'' (or "block" or "scope" or whatever). So that behaviour would be expected. | |||
::Do this, for example, and it should become a bit more obvious: | |||
::<code style="display: block">for "_j" from 1 to 10 do <br> {<br> player sideChat format["%1",_j];<br> if (_j==5) exitWith {player sideChat "5 is enough"};<br> };<br> player sideChat "Complete";</code> | |||
::--[[User:Kronzky|Kronzky]] 16:37, 7 May 2007 (CEST) |
Latest revision as of 11:53, 11 January 2023
It seems this command exits the current "scope" (is this the correct term?), rather than the current script file. Is this correct?
Example code, started using execVM:
<stuff> for "_j" from 1 to _value do { <stuff> if (<exit condition>) exitWith {player sideChat "Cancelled"}; }; player sideChat "Complete";
If the exit condition is true, both sideChats are executed. Any comments? Or am I just stating the obvious? :) --Ceeeb 10:04, 7 May 2007 (CEST)
- Seems so, yes. Good find. --raedor 12:33, 7 May 2007 (CEST)
- Yes, it only exits the current level (or "block" or "scope" or whatever). So that behaviour would be expected.
- Do this, for example, and it should become a bit more obvious:
for "_j" from 1 to 10 do
{
player sideChat format["%1",_j];
if (_j==5) exitWith {player sideChat "5 is enough"};
};
player sideChat "Complete";- --Kronzky 16:37, 7 May 2007 (CEST)