Control Structures – Talk
mNo edit summary |
|||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
:Is that a ''No''? Or a sigh of relief that we're finally going to have the dedicated pages back? ;) --[[User:Kronzky|Kronzky]] 07:17, 15 January 2007 (CET) | :Is that a ''No''? Or a sigh of relief that we're finally going to have the dedicated pages back? ;) --[[User:Kronzky|Kronzky]] 07:17, 15 January 2007 (CET) | ||
I personally find the dedicated pages completely useless: IMO they are impossible to understand because completely out of context. If a dummy goes to a page about "else" where he finds that "else" requires an if-construct and an else-construct, he will understand exactly nothing. Same for all the other. Waste of wiki space and confusing more than solving anything, if you ask me. | |||
But if you keep the structures together, e.g. if-then-else, and explain it within proper context, it is IMO clearer to understand what the "else" is really about. --[[User:Hardrock|hardrock]] 12:21, 15 January 2007 (CET) | |||
Revision as of 12:21, 15 January 2007
Reinstate the dedicated pages?
I think this page is very useful to give people an overview of the different control structures, and we should definitely keep it. But I think we should also have the dedicated pages we used to have for each specific command. That way we have a proper place for notes and discussions for the specific commands (which wouldn't quite fit in here). --Kronzky 00:47, 15 January 2007 (CET)
- I agree as well. I'm already missing those commands alot. hoz
Sigh
Planck 05:20, 15 January 2007 (CET)
- Is that a No? Or a sigh of relief that we're finally going to have the dedicated pages back? ;) --Kronzky 07:17, 15 January 2007 (CET)
I personally find the dedicated pages completely useless: IMO they are impossible to understand because completely out of context. If a dummy goes to a page about "else" where he finds that "else" requires an if-construct and an else-construct, he will understand exactly nothing. Same for all the other. Waste of wiki space and confusing more than solving anything, if you ask me.
But if you keep the structures together, e.g. if-then-else, and explain it within proper context, it is IMO clearer to understand what the "else" is really about. --hardrock 12:21, 15 January 2007 (CET)