BTS Instructions – Talk
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
mNo edit summary |
m (Confirmed) |
||
Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
:::We should, yes. ;) --[[User:Raedor|raedor]] 21:40, 13 March 2007 (CET) | :::We should, yes. ;) --[[User:Raedor|raedor]] 21:40, 13 March 2007 (CET) | ||
== Confirmed == | |||
What does "confirmed" realy mean? Some people think it is something like Acknowledged, I think it is when fix is verified and the bug is confirmed to be fixed, therefore the bug is ready to be closed. --[[User:Suma|Suma]] 16:38, 19 March 2007 (CET) |
Revision as of 16:38, 19 March 2007
Link on Bugtracker page
I've linked this page on http://bugs.armed-assault.net/main_page.php --Boecko 22:57, 16 February 2007 (CET)
Severity
What are we going to do with the "Severity" option? Will this be handled as it is now, that regular reporters only file it under a default status, and then a sysop will assign it a priority (that's how I documented it for now)?
And I guess we will have to adjust our current priorities to the new classes. --Kronzky 20:19, 17 February 2007 (CET)
- Priorities adjusted. Severity should be adjusted by sysops, as also priority. --raedor 13:46, 9 March 2007 (CET)
- shouldn't we integrate the priorities on BTS Guidelines --Boecko 13:00, 12 March 2007 (CET)
- We should, yes. ;) --raedor 21:40, 13 March 2007 (CET)
Confirmed
What does "confirmed" realy mean? Some people think it is something like Acknowledged, I think it is when fix is verified and the bug is confirmed to be fixed, therefore the bug is ready to be closed. --Suma 16:38, 19 March 2007 (CET)