Init.sqs – Talk
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
mNo edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
:Unless something has changed recently, [http://bugs.armed-assault.net/view.php?id=1782#bugnotes it shouldn't]. --[[User:Kronzky|Kronzky]] 17:17, 14 April 2007 (CEST) | :Unless something has changed recently, [http://bugs.armed-assault.net/view.php?id=1782#bugnotes it shouldn't]. --[[User:Kronzky|Kronzky]] 17:17, 14 April 2007 (CEST) | ||
:: I also noticed that the init is executed for every player that joins. Probably it is the mission start for him. --[[User:T D|T_D]] 14:36, 15 April 2007 (CEST) | :: I also noticed that the init is executed for every player that joins. Probably it is the mission start for him. --[[User:T D|T_D]] 14:36, 15 April 2007 (CEST) | ||
::I believe Suma was mistaken in what he wrote there. Executing init for JIP players is much better from a mission editing POV anyway. I sent him a message about it a while ago and he said he'd investigate but heard nothing back so hopefully the current behaviour is here to stay. --[[User:Salisan|Salisan]] 19:25, 15 April 2007 (CEST) |
Revision as of 18:25, 15 April 2007
An init.sqf file may be used instead of the init.sqs. Not sure if the article should be moved or just added to. --pyro05x 07:59, 7 February 2007 (CET)
- Add it, as the init.sqs is still working. :) --raedor 15:24, 7 February 2007 (CET)
And if there're both sqs&sqf what happens ? What is executed first ? --bdfy
- I don't know, test it :P --raedor 23:35, 7 February 2007 (CET)
Hmm, seems to execute for each player that joins, as oppose to once at the beginning of the mission... --BarmyArmy, 09:32, 14 April 2007
- Unless something has changed recently, it shouldn't. --Kronzky 17:17, 14 April 2007 (CEST)
- I also noticed that the init is executed for every player that joins. Probably it is the mission start for him. --T_D 14:36, 15 April 2007 (CEST)
- I believe Suma was mistaken in what he wrote there. Executing init for JIP players is much better from a mission editing POV anyway. I sent him a message about it a while ago and he said he'd investigate but heard nothing back so hopefully the current behaviour is here to stay. --Salisan 19:25, 15 April 2007 (CEST)