Arma 2: Scripting Commands – Category talk
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (bahh silly wiki :)) |
(New commands are done!) |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
thank you mucho :) | thank you mucho :) | ||
and can't play arma anyway.. just poking around the wiki. | and can't play arma anyway.. just poking around the wiki. | ||
<br>granQ | <br>granQ | ||
:All new commands should have definitions now! | |||
:Since this was done with a bot, it could be that some weird formatting problems were copied from the comref. I spotted (and fixed) some, but there may be others hiding... | |||
:What's left to be done (and I'm running out of time, so I won't be able to do it), is anything that has to do with Tasks (create a data type, allow them in the != & == commands, etc.). | |||
:Then, long-term, we should create [[Scripting Commands by Functionality|classifications]] for the new commands, and add some more examples, but for now we're looking good... :) | |||
:--[[User:Kronzky|Kronzky]] 18:37, 4 June 2009 (CEST) | |||
Revision as of 17:37, 4 June 2009
ArmA2 Wiki Updates
Don't waste your valuable time (that you could be spending playing ArmA!) with repetitive and mind-numbing updates to the Wiki pages!
I have a bot for that kind of jobs (it's doing the classifications right now, and will create the new pages once I have the definitions in machine-readable format).
There will still be lots of help needed, to later fine-tune all those new command descriptions, but for now I wouldn't get my fingers bloody, typing in all those new definitions... ;)
Thanks, --Kronzky 16:56, 3 June 2009 (CEST)
thank you mucho :)
and can't play arma anyway.. just poking around the wiki.
granQ
- All new commands should have definitions now!
- Since this was done with a bot, it could be that some weird formatting problems were copied from the comref. I spotted (and fixed) some, but there may be others hiding...
- What's left to be done (and I'm running out of time, so I won't be able to do it), is anything that has to do with Tasks (create a data type, allow them in the != & == commands, etc.).
- Then, long-term, we should create classifications for the new commands, and add some more examples, but for now we're looking good... :)
- --Kronzky 18:37, 4 June 2009 (CEST)