Operation Flashpoint: Addons – Category talk
m (→addons mods) |
mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
Could/should we add a category 'Translations' here?<br> | Could/should we add a category 'Translations' here?<br> | ||
After all, you can't make an add-on without knowing the Czech names ([http://community.bistudio.com/wiki/Kronzky%27s_Sandbox sandbox])<br>--[[User:Kronzky|Kronzky]] 18:34, 19 July 2006 (CEST) | After all, you can't make an add-on without knowing the Czech names ([http://community.bistudio.com/wiki/Kronzky%27s_Sandbox sandbox])<br>--[[User:Kronzky|Kronzky]] 18:34, 19 July 2006 (CEST) | ||
---- | |||
That's only needed for OFP Addons, as in ArmA you can define eg memory point names in the config ([[CfgVehicles_Config_Reference#memoryPointExhaust...]]). | |||
--[[User:Raedor|raedor]] 18:37, 19 July 2006 (CEST) | |||
Revision as of 17:37, 19 July 2006
addons mods
Could we create some sub-categories here (like 'Mods', 'Islands', 'Units', etc.)?
Otherwise everybody will just use the main page to advertise his own addon, and it'll get cluttered with thousands of listings.
We are discussing that now, and we will be creating seperate pages for each.
hoz 20:49, 18 July 2006 (CEST)
Can't see why we wouldn't do it. Categories are great.
--Salisan 18:36, 19 July 2006 (CEST)
Categories
Could/should we add a category 'Translations' here?
After all, you can't make an add-on without knowing the Czech names (sandbox)
--Kronzky 18:34, 19 July 2006 (CEST)
That's only needed for OFP Addons, as in ArmA you can define eg memory point names in the config (CfgVehicles_Config_Reference#memoryPointExhaust...).
--raedor 18:37, 19 July 2006 (CEST)