Mission Making - Getting Started – ArmA: Armed Assault Talk
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
: Perhaps it's only my feeling - you confuse standard content management system and wiki. In wiki people only edit pages, with help of content management system they publish articles. It means if you find inconvenient article there, isn't good idea to give it to author to rewriting. Wiki is about improving; with lot of small improvements from lot of people can this article be great. That's what I newer can reach myself. | : Perhaps it's only my feeling - you confuse standard content management system and wiki. In wiki people only edit pages, with help of content management system they publish articles. It means if you find inconvenient article there, isn't good idea to give it to author to rewriting. Wiki is about improving; with lot of small improvements from lot of people can this article be great. That's what I newer can reach myself. | ||
: I know there aren't many people, but if we don't start practise wiki principes, who start? --[[User:Djura|Djura]] 13:31, 7 August 2006 (CEST) | : I know there aren't many people, but if we don't start practise wiki principes, who start? --[[User:Djura|Djura]] 13:31, 7 August 2006 (CEST) | ||
:: The problem with your article is that its very incomplete, very in accurate and about a topic (ARMA) where the game isn't even released yet. I agree the wiki is about improving upon topics and articles, but an article being incomplete as this one shouldn't be categorized until its atleast readable and understandable. I don't want to scare away contributors either you present some interesting ideas, but lets make an article that is fit to digest before it ends up in the main stream categories. [[User:Hoz|hoz]] 15:52, 7 August 2006 (CEST) | |||
Revision as of 15:52, 7 August 2006
This article serves no purpose as Armed Assault isn't even released yet not to mention the article is not complete and full of errors. I'm removing it from the Armed Assault category, you can continue to work on it in your sandbox. I've noticed that with many of your articles, your english isn't the greatest, maybe you can have someone for a proof read your articles before they are listed in the main categories, I'd be happy to just leave me a talk.hoz 01:09, 6 August 2006 (CEST)
- Perhaps it's only my feeling - you confuse standard content management system and wiki. In wiki people only edit pages, with help of content management system they publish articles. It means if you find inconvenient article there, isn't good idea to give it to author to rewriting. Wiki is about improving; with lot of small improvements from lot of people can this article be great. That's what I newer can reach myself.
- I know there aren't many people, but if we don't start practise wiki principes, who start? --Djura 13:31, 7 August 2006 (CEST)
- The problem with your article is that its very incomplete, very in accurate and about a topic (ARMA) where the game isn't even released yet. I agree the wiki is about improving upon topics and articles, but an article being incomplete as this one shouldn't be categorized until its atleast readable and understandable. I don't want to scare away contributors either you present some interesting ideas, but lets make an article that is fit to digest before it ends up in the main stream categories. hoz 15:52, 7 August 2006 (CEST)