Talk:Cold War Rearmed

The project repository will be on a central server e.g.CVS.

Project Repository

I strongly suggest to use subversion instead. TortoiseSVN is a great windows based GUI client. --WGL.Q 18:44, 1 December 2006 (CET)

I agree on Subversion. It would also allow for easy MS reporting services implementation to keep track of stats and work for the project managers --SniperAndy

Call To Arms

I guess this discussion page might serve to gather the people who would like to be involved and how. If anyone feels like participating, write your area of interest/expertise here. Currently most needed are people for the Preparation phase (some experience with CVS or Subversion needed to start the repository).--Suma 11:26, 6 December 2006 (CET)

-I could assist in doing the CVS, Subversion. Would have to read up on it again but shouldn't take up to much time. --SniperAndy

Coalition of the willing

All people who sign up here show that they are willing to contribute work. The CWR team will sooner or later contact them to get more detailed information about their capabilities and on that basis CWR will decide if he/she(/it) can join the team.

• raedor (Coding/Scripting; SVN experience)
• SniperAndy (SVN and SQL, testing, forum support, project assistance)
• Jahve (Addons)
• The_Shadow (Map editing)
• ebud (Map editing, Addons)
• Kamran (Campaign and Missions conversion, Sounds/Music/Voices/Speech conversion)
• Sniperwolf572 (Mission/Campaign editing, Addons if there is need for more manpower in that department)
• Hoz (Moderator & Missions)
• Kronzky (Scripting, Bug Tracking, Web-programming)
• Tonner (Map editing)
• Spoock (Map editing, betatester & moderator or web editor)
• Jakerod (Island/Map Editing & Mission Editing. It depends on when I get my copy of ArmA I guess.)
• Apollo (Mission Editing, Bits Of Addon work but not to advanced stuff.)

Communicaton Channel

Following communication channels which I think could serve well:

1. dedicated (perhaps private) forum on the BI forums
2. wiki talk pages (I guess a separate wiki would be needed for this, perhaps with access restricted to people accepted as participants of the project)
3. any combination of above --Suma 11:37, 6 December 2006 (CET)