preloadCamera – Talk
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
:At worst, it will run the preloadcommand after (if at all) it has proceeded with whatever code is below the waituntil. | :At worst, it will run the preloadcommand after (if at all) it has proceeded with whatever code is below the waituntil. | ||
:--[[User:MaHuJa|MaHuJa]] 16:57, 28 June 2007 (CEST) | :--[[User:MaHuJa|MaHuJa]] 16:57, 28 June 2007 (CEST) | ||
---- | |||
The example with waitUntil is bad.<br> | |||
waitUntil will execute the command until condition is true, in this case it will result in multiple preloadCamera commands being issued.<br> | |||
--[[User:Cleanrock|Cleanrock]] 17:19, 28 June 2007 (CEST) | |||
---- | |||
Revision as of 16:19, 28 June 2007
This example is confusing to me. Why would you spawn with a waitUntil?? doolittle
spawn in this case has nothing to do with respawning. It merely means to start a new script, check the spawn command in the comref.
Edit: Unless I misunderstood your question, in which case.....sorry.
Planck 00:05, 22 May 2007 (CEST)
The example merely means to waituntil preloadcamera returns true. hoz
Right... but the waitUntil is pointless. That's all I mean. --Doolittle 01:23, 22 May 2007 (CEST)
- At best, Spawn is redundant. For waituntil to work, you need to already be in a 'spawned' (sleepable) script.
- Properly typechecked it would probably be a syntax error.
- At worst, it will run the preloadcommand after (if at all) it has proceeded with whatever code is below the waituntil.
- --MaHuJa 16:57, 28 June 2007 (CEST)
The example with waitUntil is bad.
waitUntil will execute the command until condition is true, in this case it will result in multiple preloadCamera commands being issued.
--Cleanrock 17:19, 28 June 2007 (CEST)