Scripting Reference – Talk
m (Command case mismatch in the examples) |
(Delete discussion of what was already done. Thanks to the ones who did the hard work.) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Making the list for OFP up to version 1.46 and a list for OFP up to version 1.97 won't be too difficult, however, making a list for ArmA will be difficult, as we have no access to such a list, nor the definitions of new commands and relevant changes to old commands. | Making the list for OFP up to version 1.46 and a list for OFP up to version 1.97 won't be too difficult, however, making a list for ArmA will be difficult, as we have no access to such a list, nor the definitions of new commands and relevant changes to old commands. | ||
Revision as of 15:33, 21 April 2006
Making the list for OFP up to version 1.46 and a list for OFP up to version 1.97 won't be too difficult, however, making a list for ArmA will be difficult, as we have no access to such a list, nor the definitions of new commands and relevant changes to old commands.
If we had such a list we might manage that better ;)
Planck
Off course, I assume nobody outside BIS can make sure ArmA list is accurate. A good starting point could be to assume all 1.97 commands are still present in ArmA. We will add new commands and remove obsolete ones later on.
--Suma 15:07, 19 April 2006 (CEST)
Ok, that sounds fair enough. :)
Planck
Command case mismatch in the examples
A lot of examples contain mismatches case in command links. To find them efficiently use Special:Wantedpages - when you see a command there, click on the number of links and you will see which pages are referencing the command by using bad case. Fixing it is then easy.
--Suma 16:32, 21 April 2006 (CEST)