do – Talk
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
What about For Type? This is also working with do not only While Type --T_D 14:51, 26 January 2007 (CET)
- "Just do it."® ;) --raedor 15:45, 26 January 2007 (CET)
There is another do command which was entered but now seems to be missing, at least I can't find it:
forcommand do code
forcommand: For Type
code: Code
I'll see if I can dig it up, if not I will re-enter it.
Planck 17:17, 26 January 2007 (CET)