Mikero – User talk

I edited several changes you made about scripting types, because they were not valid for scripting. I suppose you mixed scripting and config writing here. --Suma 11:41, 30 June 2006 (CEST)

yes. i did. Since there's nothing really 'out there' for addon token names, i'm starting somewhere

Hi Mikero, please check this. Thanks.

--Raedor 13:19, 3 July 2006 (CEST)

done, thanks

--ook? 14:37, 7 July 2006 (CEST)

Terry Pratchett fan?

Just wondered, because of your alias :-) --hardrock 01:57, 21 July 2006 (CEST)

I would sometimes prefer my Sig to be Vimes ); --ook? 02:00, 21 July 2006 (CEST)

here we go ook?

Why are you adding the return value in the command syntax?? Isn't it obvious with the return value section? --Doolittle 07:48, 25 August 2007 (CEST)

because they are far from obvious. They are syntactically incorrect not to state the return value in those instances

it is far easier to see them 'at a glance' ook?

---

Thanks for the good updates you are doing in the BIKI Mikero! --WGL.Q 09:13, 25 August 2007 (CEST)

thanks, Q. I am writing a sqs/sqf grammar (lint) checker to get over the need to run the scripts real-time to discover errors and typis. So, just going thru each command in my own engine and fixing up the wiki as I go.

Incredible work here, Mikero :) Thks for all.--Whisper 16:37, 27 August 2007 (CEST)

Minor edits?

It seems to me you are routinely marking your edits as minor, even when in fact they are not - can you please check if it is what you intended? In Wiki change is considered minor when it changes only a formatting or fixing a typo. Any change into the structure or content should not be considered minor. --Suma 10:28, 6 September 2007 (CEST)

Syntax style guidelines

It seems to me we should formalise some guidelines about how is command syntax written, as currently the style seems to be somewhat inconsistent. I am creating a new policy page for this, with a discussion:

Policy: Scripting Command Page Syntax

Mikero, please, stop changing the style of the scripting command descriptions until something is agreed about this. --Suma 10:38, 6 September 2007 (CEST)