ERRORS – Category talk
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
mNo edit summary |
mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
This doesn't really help, as i can't see what's so wrong on the categorised articles... --[[User:Raedor|raedor]] 14:47, 13 August 2006 (CEST) | This doesn't really help, as i can't see what's so wrong on the categorised articles... --[[User:Raedor|raedor]] 14:47, 13 August 2006 (CEST) | ||
:: I think they were put there because at the time the template was screwing up a bit. Hardrock has sinced corrected the template. [[User:Hoz|hoz]] 18:35, 13 August 2006 (CEST) | |||
Revision as of 18:35, 13 August 2006
Isn't that the same as a stub? --raedor 22:13, 12 August 2006 (CEST)
- I'm not quite sure why those four articles were put into the Errors category.
- As far as the "details unspecified" in the error box is concerned - that shows up if no error description is given in the errors template. Perhaps we should rephrase that to avoid confusion. --Kronzky 04:00, 13 August 2006 (CEST)
- I just rephrased the message to "error details unspecified". Hope that'll make it a bit clearer.
- And if I read the history right, it seems that Hoz classified them as faulty. We might want to check with him, why... Kronzky
The message I get now is " Faulty article: error details unspecified
This article contains errors.
If you were able to fix them, please remove the {{errors}} tag afterwards."
This doesn't really help, as i can't see what's so wrong on the categorised articles... --raedor 14:47, 13 August 2006 (CEST)
- I think they were put there because at the time the template was screwing up a bit. Hardrock has sinced corrected the template. hoz 18:35, 13 August 2006 (CEST)