Mikero – User talk
mNo edit summary |
mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
Why are you adding the return value in the command syntax?? Isn't it obvious with the return value section? --[[User:Doolittle|Doolittle]] 07:48, 25 August 2007 (CEST) | Why are you adding the return value in the command syntax?? Isn't it obvious with the return value section? --[[User:Doolittle|Doolittle]] 07:48, 25 August 2007 (CEST) | ||
because they are far from obvious | because they are far from obvious. They are syntactically incorrect not to state the return value in those instances | ||
it is far easier to see them 'at a glance' [[User:Mikero|ook?]] | it is far easier to see them 'at a glance' [[User:Mikero|ook?]] | ||
Revision as of 09:35, 25 August 2007
I edited several changes you made about scripting types, because they were not valid for scripting. I suppose you mixed scripting and config writing here. --Suma 11:41, 30 June 2006 (CEST)
yes. i did. Since there's nothing really 'out there' for addon token names, i'm starting somewhere
Hi Mikero, please check this. Thanks.
--Raedor 13:19, 3 July 2006 (CEST)
done, thanks
--ook? 14:37, 7 July 2006 (CEST)
Terry Pratchett fan?
Just wondered, because of your alias :-) --hardrock 01:57, 21 July 2006 (CEST)
I would sometimes prefer my Sig to be Vimes ); --ook? 02:00, 21 July 2006 (CEST)
here we go ook?
Why are you adding the return value in the command syntax?? Isn't it obvious with the return value section? --Doolittle 07:48, 25 August 2007 (CEST)
because they are far from obvious. They are syntactically incorrect not to state the return value in those instances
it is far easier to see them 'at a glance' ook?
Thanks for the good updates you are doing in the BIKI Mikero! --WGL.Q 09:13, 25 August 2007 (CEST)