BigDawgKS – User talk
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(→User talk reply: Seeking clarification regarding some bug.) |
Big Dawg KS (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 30: | Line 30: | ||
I'm not sure I understand. We're ratifying a bug for behaviour that's a feature? --[[User:Plaintiff1|Plaintiff1]] 08:13, 2 February 2007 (CET) | I'm not sure I understand. We're ratifying a bug for behaviour that's a feature? --[[User:Plaintiff1|Plaintiff1]] 08:13, 2 February 2007 (CET) | ||
: I don't know, ask Hoz... --[[User:BigDawgKS|Big Dawg KS]] 22:44, 2 February 2007 (CET) | |||
Revision as of 23:44, 2 February 2007
The templates are done, here's an example:
General Issues
--raedor 13:30, 18 December 2006 (CET)
User talk reply
Burns you should probably put some of your "bug" reports in the wish list, as I don't see some of them qualifying as bugs. Ex: Still no M203 iron sight although the engine would be perect to simulate rl sight behaviour...
I´d rate this as a bug because if you play without crosshairs there´s no way to know where the shells will land. Pretty serious if you ask me ;-) burns 22:03, 19 December 2006 (CET)
- Well I wouldn't, if BIS intended for there to be ironsights for the grenade launchers and they were missing it would be a bug, but they didn't. It's a non-feature and belongs in the wish list. You have to be able to admit wether something is really not as it was intended or if BIS just left it out, however disappointing it may be (sorry). --Big Dawg KS 02:55, 20 December 2006 (CET)
The bug report about the map scrolling issue is updated in the ArmA bug list. Here's the video: Video (xvid). Please reconsider the bug priority, this bug is driving me crazy. -Xpz
- When switching between an already adjusted commander view and first person view, commander review will reset to default again. This was not the case in OFP -Redface
Bug or lack of feature? --Plaintiff1 22:36, 1 February 2007 (CET)
I think Hoz said that's (or something similar about the views centering) by design. --Big Dawg KS 01:14, 2 February 2007 (CET)
I'm not sure I understand. We're ratifying a bug for behaviour that's a feature? --Plaintiff1 08:13, 2 February 2007 (CET)
- I don't know, ask Hoz... --Big Dawg KS 22:44, 2 February 2007 (CET)