SafeZone – Talk
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
PhilippRauch (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
PhilippRauch (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
--[[User:HeliJunkie|HeliJunkie]] 21:04, 9 June 2009 (CEST) | --[[User:HeliJunkie|HeliJunkie]] 21:04, 9 June 2009 (CEST) | ||
True, thats not what i meant... all commands from BIS seem to begin with a small letter, but with SafeZoneX etc.. it seems they deviated from this 'tradition'. Following that 'tradition' it would be '''s'''afeZoneX not '''S'''afeZoneX ... | True, but thats not what i meant... all commands from BIS seem to begin with a small letter, but with SafeZoneX etc.. it seems they deviated from this 'tradition'. Following that 'tradition' it would be '''s'''afeZoneX not '''S'''afeZoneX ... | ||
Why? Is there a important reason? Or is it just a typo? | Why? Is there a important reason? Or is it just a typo? | ||
--[[User:Vigilante|Vigilante]] 00:45, 10 June 2009 (CEST) | --[[User:Vigilante|Vigilante]] 00:45, 10 June 2009 (CEST) | ||
Revision as of 23:55, 9 June 2009
Shouldnt it be safeZone for all commands regarding that? I.e. safeZoneX, safeZoneY, safeZoneW, safeZoneH ?? So it correlates with BIS other naming of commands? --Vigilante 00:47, 10 June 2009 (CEST)
SafeZone is the area. SafeZoneX and the orther are functions to return the size of this area for me. --HeliJunkie 21:04, 9 June 2009 (CEST)
True, but thats not what i meant... all commands from BIS seem to begin with a small letter, but with SafeZoneX etc.. it seems they deviated from this 'tradition'. Following that 'tradition' it would be safeZoneX not SafeZoneX ... Why? Is there a important reason? Or is it just a typo? --Vigilante 00:45, 10 June 2009 (CEST)