with – Talk
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
(Responded) |
||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
"With" alone doesn't give you an idea what it is about. --[[User:Kju|Kju]] 09:00, 12 June 2011 (CEST) | "With" alone doesn't give you an idea what it is about. --[[User:Kju|Kju]] 09:00, 12 June 2011 (CEST) | ||
:Wouldn't we also need to change articlenames like [[do]] then? | :Wouldn't we also need to change articlenames like [[do]] then? | ||
::One could yes. Have to no. Yet it is something to think about / discuss. --[[User:Kju|Kju]] 22:22, 14 June 2011 (CEST) |
Latest revision as of 21:22, 14 June 2011
It might be more sensible to have the page named "with Namespace do". "With" alone doesn't give you an idea what it is about. --Kju 09:00, 12 June 2011 (CEST)