append: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
SilentSpike (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
Killzone Kid (talk | contribs) (see also) |
||
Line 26: | Line 26: | ||
____________________________________________________________________________________________ | ____________________________________________________________________________________________ | ||
| [[set]], [[pushBack]], [[resize]], [[reverse]], [[count]], [[find]], [[in]], [[forEach]], [[deleteAt]], [[deleteRange]], [[BIS_fnc_arrayPushStack]], [[BIS_fnc_arrayPush]] |= See also | | [[set]], [[pushBack]], [[resize]], [[reverse]], [[count]], [[find]], [[in]], [[forEach]], [[deleteAt]], [[deleteRange]], [[sort]], [[BIS_fnc_arrayPushStack]], [[BIS_fnc_arrayPush]] |= See also | ||
}} | }} |
Revision as of 18:24, 16 April 2015
Description
- Description:
- Appends array2 to the back of array1 modifying array1.
- Groups:
- Uncategorised
Syntax
Examples
Additional Information
- See also:
- setpushBackresizereversecountfindinforEachdeleteAtdeleteRangesortBIS_fnc_arrayPushStackBIS_fnc_arrayPush
Notes
-
Report bugs on the Feedback Tracker and/or discuss them on the Arma Discord or on the Forums.
Only post proven facts here! Add Note
- Posted on March 9, 2015 - 00:41 (UTC)
- Heeeere's Johnny!
-
_array1 append _array2
is roughly 1.2x faster (depending on array size) than_array1 = _array1 + _array2
(Averaged over 10.000 iterations with two identical arrays containing the numbers 0 through 9)
The larger the arrays to append, the faster append is as it does not create a new array, which happens with array addition.