append: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
mNo edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 30: | Line 30: | ||
}} | }} | ||
<!-- CONTINUE Notes --> | |||
<dl class="command_description"> | |||
<dd class="notedate">Posted on March 9, 2015 - 00:41 (UTC)</dd> | |||
<dt class="note">[[User:Heeeere's Johnny!|Heeeere's Johnny!]]</dt> | |||
<dd class="note"> | |||
<code>_array1 [[append]] _array2</code> is roughly 1.2x faster (depending on array size) than <code>_array1 <nowiki>=</nowiki> _array1 + _array2</code>(Averaged over 10.000 iterations with two identical arrays containing the numbers 0 through 9)<br /> | |||
The larger the arrays to append, the faster [[append]] is as it does not create a new array, which happens with array addition. | |||
</dd> | |||
</dl> | |||
<!-- DISCONTINUE Notes --> |
Revision as of 01:41, 9 March 2015
Description
- Description:
- Appends array2 to the back of array1 modifying array1.
- Groups:
- Uncategorised
Syntax
Examples
Additional Information
- See also:
- setpushBackresizereversecountfindinforEachdeleteAtdeleteRangeBIS_fnc_arrayPushStackBIS_fnc_arrayPush
Notes
-
Report bugs on the Feedback Tracker and/or discuss them on the Arma Discord or on the Forums.
Only post proven facts here! Add Note
- Posted on March 9, 2015 - 00:41 (UTC)
- Heeeere's Johnny!
-
_array1 append _array2
is roughly 1.2x faster (depending on array size) than_array1 = _array1 + _array2
(Averaged over 10.000 iterations with two identical arrays containing the numbers 0 through 9)
The larger the arrays to append, the faster append is as it does not create a new array, which happens with array addition.