ArmA: Bugs List-version-1.01.5094 – Talk
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
mNo edit summary |
||
Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
:::Only if it is fixed, not if it has nothing to do with bugs. --[[User:Raedor|raedor]] 00:50, 5 December 2006 (CET) | :::Only if it is fixed, not if it has nothing to do with bugs. --[[User:Raedor|raedor]] 00:50, 5 December 2006 (CET) | ||
::::How do we know if it's fixed yet or not? I mean you could have posted something here but | ::::How do we know if it's fixed yet or not? I mean you could have posted something here but it may not have been fixed Oo --[[User:Serclaes|Serclaes]] 01:26, 5 December 2006 (CET) | ||
:::::The only source for knowing that can be History logs of patches, as you saw it for patch v1.01. --[[User:Raedor|raedor]] 01:29, 5 December 2006 (CET) |
Revision as of 01:29, 5 December 2006
Should the old reports be deleted? --Serclaes 00:01, 3 December 2006 (CET)
- Which old reports? Things that are fixed meanwhile? Yes ;) --raedor 09:15, 3 December 2006 (CET)
- Please use <del>deleted material</del> syntax instead of actually removing them. Example:
Some bug reported in first release[fixed in 1.xx.xxx] --Vic 00:27, 5 December 2006 (CET)
- Only if it is fixed, not if it has nothing to do with bugs. --raedor 00:50, 5 December 2006 (CET)
- How do we know if it's fixed yet or not? I mean you could have posted something here but it may not have been fixed Oo --Serclaes 01:26, 5 December 2006 (CET)
- The only source for knowing that can be History logs of patches, as you saw it for patch v1.01. --raedor 01:29, 5 December 2006 (CET)