nearestObject – Talk
No edit summary |
Lou Montana (talk | contribs) m (Text replacement - "Offical" to "Official") |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
In OFP nearestObject had the annoying behaviour that '''nearestObject[obj,typeof obj]''' returned the object itself. This meant that it was very difficult to find the nearest team-mate for example without writing code to iterate over all known objects and manually compare the distances. Is this behaviour changed for Armed Assault ? | In OFP nearestObject had the annoying behaviour that '''nearestObject[obj,typeof obj]''' returned the object itself. This meant that it was very difficult to find the nearest team-mate for example without writing code to iterate over all known objects and manually compare the distances. Is this behaviour changed for Armed Assault ? | ||
:: No developer questions. Please keep the questions to the | :: No developer questions. Please keep the questions to the Official BI Forums. | ||
::[[User:Hoz|hoz]] 03:09, 20 July 2006 (CEST) | ::[[User:Hoz|hoz]] 03:09, 20 July 2006 (CEST) | ||
Latest revision as of 17:08, 1 February 2021
In OFP nearestObject had the annoying behaviour that nearestObject[obj,typeof obj] returned the object itself. This meant that it was very difficult to find the nearest team-mate for example without writing code to iterate over all known objects and manually compare the distances. Is this behaviour changed for Armed Assault ?
- No developer questions. Please keep the questions to the Official BI Forums.
- hoz 03:09, 20 July 2006 (CEST)
Icon for introduced in ...
A generally remark, i know...: Although it might interesting sometimes to know when a command was introduced, wouldn't it a better idea to show the user for which game(s) the command is valid. Or will a command/syntax labeled by e.g. the "Flashpoint" 1.0 icon automatically also be a valid command for the succeeding games? --TomNedry 23:56, 9 February 2007 (CET)
- There's no official statement on what happens after ArmA, but all OFP commands (beside object) are still working in ArmA, afaik. --raedor 00:07, 10 February 2007 (CET)
Copy that! Although it's a little bit dissapointing that there's no statement for this subject-development for the time after ArmA...;-) --TomNedry 12:40, 10 February 2007 (CET)