surfaceType: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(add. note) |
No edit summary |
||
Line 25: | Line 25: | ||
<!-- Note Section BEGIN --> | <!-- Note Section BEGIN --> | ||
<dd class="notedate">Posted on December 16, 2006 - 23:45</dd> | <dd class="notedate">Posted on December 16, 2006 - 23:45</dd> | ||
<dt class="note">'''[[User: | <dt class="note">'''[[User:VictorF|VictorF]]'''</dt><dd class="note">Another returned value is "#SANDGENERAL". However, when providing an exact [x,y] position the "surfaceType" function seems to return the general surface type of the environment rather than the exact type on that given position.</dd> | ||
<!-- Note Section END --> | <!-- Note Section END --> | ||
</dl> | </dl> |
Revision as of 15:12, 30 December 2006
Description
- Description:
- Returns what surface is at the given position.
- Groups:
- Uncategorised
Syntax
Examples
- Examples:
- Example needed
Additional Information
- See also:
- See also needed
Notes
-
Report bugs on the Feedback Tracker and/or discuss them on the Arma Discord or on the Forums.
Only post proven facts here! Add Note
Notes
- Posted on December 16, 2006 - 23:45
- VictorF
- Another returned value is "#SANDGENERAL". However, when providing an exact [x,y] position the "surfaceType" function seems to return the general surface type of the environment rather than the exact type on that given position.