SafeZone – Talk
PhilippRauch (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
(upper or lower case?) |
||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
Why? Is there a important reason? Or is it just a typo? | Why? Is there a important reason? Or is it just a typo? | ||
--[[User:Vigilante|Vigilante]] 00:45, 10 June 2009 (CEST) | --[[User:Vigilante|Vigilante]] 00:45, 10 June 2009 (CEST) | ||
:The capitalization doesn't really matter (at least not for Arma). | |||
:When I generated the pages I went by the capitalization as it was in the ComRef - no idea if there's a rhyme or reason behind what's uppercase and what's lower, but I wouldn't worry about it too much... ;) | |||
:--[[User:Kronzky|Kronzky]] 05:14, 10 June 2009 (CEST) | |||
Revision as of 04:14, 10 June 2009
Shouldnt it be safeZone for all commands regarding that? I.e. safeZoneX, safeZoneY, safeZoneW, safeZoneH ?? So it correlates with BIS other naming of commands? --Vigilante 00:47, 10 June 2009 (CEST)
SafeZone is the area. SafeZoneX and the orther are functions to return the size of this area for me. --HeliJunkie 21:04, 9 June 2009 (CEST)
True, but thats not what i meant... all commands from BIS seem to begin with a small letter, but with SafeZoneX etc.. it seems they deviated from this 'tradition'. Following that 'tradition' it would be safeZoneX not SafeZoneX ... I propose a move of all related pages that contain a capital first letter, which is not used on any other commands, except the mentioned Why? Is there a important reason? Or is it just a typo? --Vigilante 00:45, 10 June 2009 (CEST)
- The capitalization doesn't really matter (at least not for Arma).
- When I generated the pages I went by the capitalization as it was in the ComRef - no idea if there's a rhyme or reason behind what's uppercase and what's lower, but I wouldn't worry about it too much... ;)
- --Kronzky 05:14, 10 June 2009 (CEST)