Naming Conventions – Bohemia Interactive Community talk
PhilippRauch (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
(ArmA 2) |
||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
How about adding the entries for Arma2/ArmaII ... which one is more 'correct' ? According to the devlopers blog at BI Website, both are fine. Whats your take? --[[User:Vigilante|Vigilante]] 17:27, 15 June 2009 (CEST) | How about adding the entries for Arma2/ArmaII ... which one is more 'correct' ? According to the devlopers blog at BI Website, both are fine. Whats your take? --[[User:Vigilante|Vigilante]] 17:27, 15 June 2009 (CEST) | ||
== ArmA 2 == | |||
What's the correct naming for [[ArmA 2]] in wiki? If you check [[:Category:ArmA_2]] there's ''ArmA 2'', ''Arma 2'' and ''ArmA2'' being used. Also ''ARMA 2'' is often used outside the wiki. [http://www.bistudio.com/developers-blog/arma-2-the-name-tale_en.html ARMA 2 - The Name Tale] article doesn't give definitive answer either except that long name, ''Armed Assault 2'' shouldn't be used at all. | |||
Anyways we should stick to one short name whichever it is. --[[User:Rok|Rok]] 17:11, 31 July 2009 (CEST) | |||
Revision as of 16:11, 31 July 2009
Could we expand this list somewhat (go a bit more into detail)? So that something like the mess with my lists [Actions] & [EventHandlers] won't happen again...;) --Kronzky 00:48, 23 July 2006 (CEST)
- We can. --Djura 19:45, 23 July 2006 (CEST)
<draft>
Proper examples of naming
Operation Flashpoint: Actions List
Template:Box File
Template:Infobox squad
Category:Scripting Topics
Category:Armed Assault: Editing
</draft>
How about adding the entries for Arma2/ArmaII ... which one is more 'correct' ? According to the devlopers blog at BI Website, both are fine. Whats your take? --Vigilante 17:27, 15 June 2009 (CEST)
ArmA 2
What's the correct naming for ArmA 2 in wiki? If you check Category:ArmA_2 there's ArmA 2, Arma 2 and ArmA2 being used. Also ARMA 2 is often used outside the wiki. ARMA 2 - The Name Tale article doesn't give definitive answer either except that long name, Armed Assault 2 shouldn't be used at all. Anyways we should stick to one short name whichever it is. --Rok 17:11, 31 July 2009 (CEST)