do – Talk

What about For Type? This is also working with do not only While Type --T_D 14:51, 26 January 2007 (CET)

"Just do it."® ;) --raedor 15:45, 26 January 2007 (CET)

---

There is another do command which was entered but now seems to be missing, at least I can't find it:

forcommand do code

forcommand: For Type

code: Code

I'll see if I can dig it up, if not I will re-enter it.

Planck 17:17, 26 January 2007 (CET)

moved blurb

i have moved the confusion blurb to the while statement since everything mentioned in that blurb was a while condition and nothing to do with the 'do' itself

The forCommand was a whitespace typo. it is the for do command

ook? 06:57, 5 September 2007 (CEST)