Code Optimisation: Difference between revisions

From Bohemia Interactive Community
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
mNo edit summary
Line 16: Line 16:
*_y=0; while {_y = _y + 1; _y < count [0,0,0,0]} do { ... };
*_y=0; while {_y = _y + 1; _y < count [0,0,0,0]} do { ... };
*for [{_y=0},{_y<(count [0,0,0,0])},{_y=_y+1}] do { ... }
*for [{_y=0},{_y<(count [0,0,0,0])},{_y=_y+1}] do { ... }
==Avoid O(n^2)!!==
Commonly you may set up foreach foreach's.
'For' example:
*{ { ... } foreach [0,0,0]; } foreach [0,0,0];
This example is of the order (n^2) (3^2 = 9 iterations). For each element you add to this, it will increase the processing exponentially. Which can lead to poor performance in snap functions.
==Avoiding the 0.3ms delay==
Many times you may want to avoid the '''0.3 ms''' delay (not 3ms!), and there a few tricks around how to do it...

Revision as of 22:46, 20 January 2010

Adding elements to an array

Getting position

Loops

These first two loop types are identical in speed (+/- 10%), and are more than 2x as fast the proceeding two loop types.

  • "_y" from 0 to (count [0,0,0,0] - 1) step 1 do { ... };
  • { ... } foreach [0,0,0,0];

Where as these two loops are much slower, and for maximum performance, avoided.

  • _y=0; while {_y = _y + 1; _y < count [0,0,0,0]} do { ... };
  • for [{_y=0},{_y<(count [0,0,0,0])},{_y=_y+1}] do { ... }

Avoid O(n^2)!!

Commonly you may set up foreach foreach's. 'For' example:

  • { { ... } foreach [0,0,0]; } foreach [0,0,0];

This example is of the order (n^2) (3^2 = 9 iterations). For each element you add to this, it will increase the processing exponentially. Which can lead to poor performance in snap functions.

Avoiding the 0.3ms delay

Many times you may want to avoid the 0.3 ms delay (not 3ms!), and there a few tricks around how to do it...