SafeZone – Talk
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
PhilippRauch (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
PhilippRauch (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
SafeZoneX and the orther are functions to return the size of this area for me. | SafeZoneX and the orther are functions to return the size of this area for me. | ||
--[[User:HeliJunkie|HeliJunkie]] 21:04, 9 June 2009 (CEST) | --[[User:HeliJunkie|HeliJunkie]] 21:04, 9 June 2009 (CEST) | ||
True, thats not what i meant... all commands from BIS seem to begin with a small letter, but with SafeZoneX etc.. its seems they deviated from this 'tradition'. Why? Is there a important reason? Or is it just a typo? | True, thats not what i meant... all commands from BIS seem to begin with a small letter, but with SafeZoneX etc.. its seems they deviated from this 'tradition'. Why? Is there a important reason? Or is it just a typo? | ||
PS: Thanks | |||
PS: Thanks HeliJunkie for the tilde shortcut hint! :) | |||
--[[User:Vigilante|Vigilante]] 00:45, 10 June 2009 (CEST) | --[[User:Vigilante|Vigilante]] 00:45, 10 June 2009 (CEST) | ||
Revision as of 00:46, 10 June 2009
Shouldnt it be safeZone for all commands regarding that? I.e. safeZoneX, safeZoneY, safeZoneW, safeZoneH ?? So it correlates with BIS other naming of commands?
SafeZone is the area. SafeZoneX and the orther are functions to return the size of this area for me. --HeliJunkie 21:04, 9 June 2009 (CEST)
True, thats not what i meant... all commands from BIS seem to begin with a small letter, but with SafeZoneX etc.. its seems they deviated from this 'tradition'. Why? Is there a important reason? Or is it just a typo?
PS: Thanks HeliJunkie for the tilde shortcut hint! :) --Vigilante 00:45, 10 June 2009 (CEST)