do – Talk
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
mNo edit summary |
(moved blurb) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
What about [[For Type]]? This is also working with [[do]] not only [[While Type]] --[[User:T D|T_D]] 14:51, 26 January 2007 (CET) | What about [[For Type]]? This is also working with [[do]] not only [[While Type]] --[[User:T D|T_D]] 14:51, 26 January 2007 (CET) | ||
:"Just do it."® ;) --[[User:Raedor|raedor]] 15:45, 26 January 2007 (CET) | :"Just do it."® ;) --[[User:Raedor|raedor]] 15:45, 26 January 2007 (CET) | ||
---- | |||
There is another do command which was entered but now seems to be missing, at least I can't find it: | |||
forcommand '''do''' code | |||
forcommand: For Type | |||
code: Code | |||
I'll see if I can dig it up, if not I will re-enter it. | |||
[[User:Planck|Planck]] 17:17, 26 January 2007 (CET) | |||
== moved blurb == | |||
i have moved the confusion blurb to the [[while]] statement since everything mentioned in that blurb was a while condition and nothing to do with the 'do' itself | |||
The forCommand was a whitespace typo. it is the [[for_do|for do]] command | |||
[[User:Mikero|ook?]] 06:57, 5 September 2007 (CEST) | |||
Latest revision as of 06:57, 5 September 2007
What about For Type? This is also working with do not only While Type --T_D 14:51, 26 January 2007 (CET)
- "Just do it."® ;) --raedor 15:45, 26 January 2007 (CET)
There is another do command which was entered but now seems to be missing, at least I can't find it:
forcommand do code
forcommand: For Type
code: Code
I'll see if I can dig it up, if not I will re-enter it.
Planck 17:17, 26 January 2007 (CET)
moved blurb
i have moved the confusion blurb to the while statement since everything mentioned in that blurb was a while condition and nothing to do with the 'do' itself
The forCommand was a whitespace typo. it is the for do command
ook? 06:57, 5 September 2007 (CEST)