Hardrock – User talk
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(wanted pages) |
(New Commands listed under OFP:R?) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
:I may write a bot to go through the "wanted pages" list, and to automatically create any needed talk pages. Shouldn't be too hard. Once that thing is running we might also be able to use it for the creation of user pages/sandboxes. --[[User:Kronzky|Kronzky]] 22:40, 2 August 2006 (CEST) | :I may write a bot to go through the "wanted pages" list, and to automatically create any needed talk pages. Shouldn't be too hard. Once that thing is running we might also be able to use it for the creation of user pages/sandboxes. --[[User:Kronzky|Kronzky]] 22:40, 2 August 2006 (CEST) | ||
::Actually, it probably makes more sense (and would be ''a lot'' less work) to just set the "Wanted Pages" threshold a bit higher. That way we don't have hundreds of empty, unused pages filling up the Wiki, and it would also get rid of lots of other references that don't really need to be on that list. (I've asked [http://community.bistudio.com/wiki/User_talk:Hlavac Hlavac] about it, and am waiting for his answer.) I'll still keep working on a bot for other purposes, but for this issue, auto-generating pages may not be the best solution. --[[User:Kronzky|Kronzky]] 22:28, 4 August 2006 (CEST) | ::Actually, it probably makes more sense (and would be ''a lot'' less work) to just set the "Wanted Pages" threshold a bit higher. That way we don't have hundreds of empty, unused pages filling up the Wiki, and it would also get rid of lots of other references that don't really need to be on that list. (I've asked [http://community.bistudio.com/wiki/User_talk:Hlavac Hlavac] about it, and am waiting for his answer.) I'll still keep working on a bot for other purposes, but for this issue, auto-generating pages may not be the best solution. --[[User:Kronzky|Kronzky]] 22:28, 4 August 2006 (CEST) | ||
== New Commands listed under OFP:R? == | |||
I noticed a lot (all?) of the new commands are listed in your template as "Operation Flashpoint: Resistance / V1.86". (e.g. [[createTrigger]], [[deleteCenter]], etc.) Is that the "official" name for ArmA (OFP:R, V1.86), or did something go wrong during the conversion? --[[User:Kronzky|Kronzky]] 01:36, 6 August 2006 (CEST) | |||
Revision as of 01:36, 6 August 2006
Hardrock, your one template is creating many many wanted talk pages for each of the commands. Last night I broke the link and it took some time for the wiki monster to remove those links. This makes it hard to locating any errors as there are 700 or so wanted talk pages. hoz 15:55, 2 August 2006 (CEST)
- I may write a bot to go through the "wanted pages" list, and to automatically create any needed talk pages. Shouldn't be too hard. Once that thing is running we might also be able to use it for the creation of user pages/sandboxes. --Kronzky 22:40, 2 August 2006 (CEST)
- Actually, it probably makes more sense (and would be a lot less work) to just set the "Wanted Pages" threshold a bit higher. That way we don't have hundreds of empty, unused pages filling up the Wiki, and it would also get rid of lots of other references that don't really need to be on that list. (I've asked Hlavac about it, and am waiting for his answer.) I'll still keep working on a bot for other purposes, but for this issue, auto-generating pages may not be the best solution. --Kronzky 22:28, 4 August 2006 (CEST)
New Commands listed under OFP:R?
I noticed a lot (all?) of the new commands are listed in your template as "Operation Flashpoint: Resistance / V1.86". (e.g. createTrigger, deleteCenter, etc.) Is that the "official" name for ArmA (OFP:R, V1.86), or did something go wrong during the conversion? --Kronzky 01:36, 6 August 2006 (CEST)