append: Difference between revisions

From Bohemia Interactive Community
Jump to navigation Jump to search
mNo edit summary
(see also)
Line 26: Line 26:
____________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________


| [[set]], [[pushBack]], [[resize]], [[reverse]], [[count]], [[find]], [[in]], [[forEach]], [[deleteAt]], [[deleteRange]], [[BIS_fnc_arrayPushStack]], [[BIS_fnc_arrayPush]] |= See also
| [[set]], [[pushBack]], [[resize]], [[reverse]], [[count]], [[find]], [[in]], [[forEach]], [[deleteAt]], [[deleteRange]], [[sort]], [[BIS_fnc_arrayPushStack]], [[BIS_fnc_arrayPush]] |= See also


}}
}}

Revision as of 19:24, 16 April 2015

Hover & click on the images for description

Description

Description:
Appends array2 to the back of array1 modifying array1.
Groups:
Uncategorised

Syntax

Syntax:
array1 append array2
Parameters:
array1: Array
array2: Array
Return Value:
Nothing

Examples

Example 1:
_arr = [1,2,3]; _arr append [4,5,6]; hint str _arr; //[1,2,3,4,5,6]

Additional Information

See also:
setpushBackresizereversecountfindinforEachdeleteAtdeleteRangesortBIS_fnc_arrayPushStackBIS_fnc_arrayPush

Notes

Report bugs on the Feedback Tracker and/or discuss them on the Arma Discord or on the Forums.
Only post proven facts here! Add Note
Posted on March 9, 2015 - 00:41 (UTC)
Heeeere's Johnny!
_array1 append _array2 is roughly 1.2x faster (depending on array size) than _array1 = _array1 + _array2(Averaged over 10.000 iterations with two identical arrays containing the numbers 0 through 9)
The larger the arrays to append, the faster append is as it does not create a new array, which happens with array addition.