apply: Difference between revisions

From Bohemia Interactive Community
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
m (note edit with better results)
Line 57: Line 57:
<dt class="note">[[User:Lou Montana|Lou Montana]]</dt>
<dt class="note">[[User:Lou Montana|Lou Montana]]</dt>
<dd class="note">
<dd class="note">
if performance really is an issue, [[apply]] seems to be (very) slightly faster than [[forEach]] (by less than a percent, 0.7% in my tests to be precise).
if performance really is an issue, [[apply]] seems to be (very) slightly faster than [[forEach]] (by more or less one percent, 0.7-1.5% in my tests to be precise).
</dd>
</dd>
</dl>
</dl>
<!-- DISCONTINUE Notes -->
<!-- DISCONTINUE Notes -->

Revision as of 01:03, 12 February 2018

Hover & click on the images for description

Description

Description:
Applies given code to each element of the array and returns resulting array. The value of the current array element, to which the code will be applied, is stored in variable _x.
Groups:
Uncategorised

Syntax

Syntax:
array apply code
Parameters:
array: Array - array of Anything
code: Code - code to be executed on each element of the array. Current element value is stored in variable _x
Return Value:
Array - resulting array

Examples

Example 1:
_arr = [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,0] apply {[1,0] select (_x % 2 == 0)}; //[1,0,1,0,1,0,1,0,1,0]
Example 2:
_arr = [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,0] apply {_x ^ _x}; //[1,4,27,256,3125,46656,823543,16777216,387420480,1]
Example 3:
_arr1 = []; _arr1 resize 20; _arr2 = _arr1 apply {0}; //[0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0]

Additional Information

See also:
setresizepushBackpushBackUniqueselectreversecountfindinforEachdeleteAtdeleteRangeappendsortarrayIntersectBIS_fnc_arrayPushStackBIS_fnc_arrayPush

Notes

Report bugs on the Feedback Tracker and/or discuss them on the Arma Discord or on the Forums.
Only post proven facts here! Add Note

Notes

Bottom Section

Posted on February 18, 2016 - 11:03 (UTC)
Fusselwurm
(to anyone else wondering, I took a minute to get it): This is Array.map() is JavaScript
Posted on February 11, 2018 - 23:02 (UTC)
Lou Montana
if performance really is an issue, apply seems to be (very) slightly faster than forEach (by more or less one percent, 0.7-1.5% in my tests to be precise).