apply: Difference between revisions

From Bohemia Interactive Community
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Corrected some stuff)
m (Removed duplicate word)
Line 22: Line 22:
|p21= hashmap: [[HashMap]]
|p21= hashmap: [[HashMap]]


|p22= code: [[Code]] - Code to be executed on each key-value pair of the hashmap. The current key is stored in the magic variable variable [[Magic Variables#x|_x]], the corresponding value is stored in [[Magic Variables#y|_y]].
|p22= code: [[Code]] - Code to be executed on each key-value pair of the hashmap. The current key is stored in the magic variable [[Magic Variables#x|_x]], the corresponding value is stored in [[Magic Variables#y|_y]].


|r2= [[Array]] - Resulting array
|r2= [[Array]] - Resulting array

Revision as of 18:54, 14 August 2021

Hover & click on the images for description

Description

Description:
Applies the given code to each element of the given data structure and returns the result as an array.
Groups:
ArraysHashMap

Syntax

Syntax:
array apply code
Parameters:
array: Array - Array of Anything
code: Code - Code to be executed on each element of the array. The current element value is stored in the magic variable _x.
Return Value:
Array - Resulting array

Alternative Syntax

Syntax:
hashmap apply code
Parameters:
hashmap: HashMap
code: Code - Code to be executed on each key-value pair of the hashmap. The current key is stored in the magic variable _x, the corresponding value is stored in _y.
Return Value:
Array - Resulting array

Examples

Example 1:
_arr = [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,0] apply {[1,0] select (_x % 2 == 0)}; // [1,0,1,0,1,0,1,0,1,0]
Example 2:
_arr = [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,0] apply {_x ^ _x}; // [1,4,27,256,3125,46656,823543,16777216,387420480,1]
Example 3:
_arr1 = []; _arr1 resize 20; _arr2 = _arr1 apply {0}; // [0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0]
Example 4:
[0,1,2,3,4] apply {str _x}; // ["0","1","2","3","4"]
Example 5:
_hashmap = createHashMapFromArray [["Key 1", "Value 1"], ["Key 2", "Value 2"]]; _array = _hashmap apply {_y + " Test"}; // ["Value 2 Test","Value 1 Test"]

Additional Information

See also:
set resize pushBack pushBackUnique select reverse count find in forEach deleteAt deleteRange append sort arrayIntersect

Notes

Report bugs on the Feedback Tracker and/or discuss them on the Arma Discord or on the Forums.
Only post proven facts here! Add Note
Posted on February 18, 2016 - 11:03 (UTC)
Fusselwurm
(to anyone else wondering, I took a minute to get it): This is Array.map() in JavaScript
Posted on February 11, 2018 - 23:02 (UTC)
Lou Montana
if performance really is an issue, apply seems to be (very) slightly faster than forEach (by more or less one percent, 0.7-1.5% in my tests to be precise).