deleteAt: Difference between revisions

From Bohemia Interactive Community
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Expanded comment by note about how it came into being)
No edit summary
Line 45: Line 45:
<code>_array = _array - [_array select 0]</code>
<code>_array = _array - [_array select 0]</code>
(Tested with an array of 10.000 strings, iterating through it using a for-from-to-do loop)
(Tested with an array of 10.000 strings, iterating through it using a for-from-to-do loop)
<!-- CONTINUE Notes -->
<dl class="command_description">
<dd class="notedate">Posted on October 15, 2014 - 16:55 (UTC)</dd>
<dt class="note">[[User:Heeeere's Johnny!|Heeeere's Johnny!]]</dt>
<dd class="note"> <code>_array deleteAt 0</code>is almost 60x faster than<code>_array = _array - [_array select 0]</code>(Tested with an array of 10.000 strings, iterating through it using a for-from-to-do loop)
</dd>
</dl>
<!-- DISCONTINUE Notes -->

Revision as of 17:55, 15 October 2014

Hover & click on the images for description

Description

Description:
Removes array element at the given index and returns removed element (modifies the original array, just like resize or set).
Groups:
Uncategorised

Syntax

Syntax:
array deleteAt index
Parameters:
array: Array
index: Number
Return Value:
Anything

Examples

Example 1:
_arr = [1,2,3]; _rem = _arr deleteAt 1; hint str [_rem, _arr]; //[2,[1,3]]

Additional Information

See also:
deleteRangesetresizeselectinfindtoArraytoStringforEachcountpushBack

Notes

Report bugs on the Feedback Tracker and/or discuss them on the Arma Discord or on the Forums.
Only post proven facts here! Add Note

Notes

Bottom Section


_array deleteAt 0 is almost 60x faster than _array = _array - [_array select 0] (Tested with an array of 10.000 strings, iterating through it using a for-from-to-do loop)

Posted on October 15, 2014 - 16:55 (UTC)
Heeeere's Johnny!
_array deleteAt 0is almost 60x faster than_array = _array - [_array select 0](Tested with an array of 10.000 strings, iterating through it using a for-from-to-do loop)