apply: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 15:02, 26 January 2021

Game1 needed - Version1 needed

Hover & click on the images for description

Description:: This article is a Stub. You can help BI Community Wiki by expanding it.
Description needed
Groups:: Arrays

Syntax:: Syntax needed
Parameters:: array: Array - array of Anything
: code: Code - code to be executed on each element of the array. Current element value is stored in variable _x
Return Value:: Return value needed

Example 1:: _arr = [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,0] apply {[1,0] select (_x % 2 == 0)}; //[1,0,1,0,1,0,1,0,1,0]
Example 2:: _arr = [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,0] apply {_x ^ _x}; //[1,4,27,256,3125,46656,823543,16777216,387420480,1]
Example 3:: _arr1 = []; _arr1 resize 20; _arr2 = _arr1 apply {0}; //[0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0]
Example 4:: [0,1,2,3,4] apply {str _x}; // Returns ["0","1","2","3","4"]

: Report bugs on the Feedback Tracker and/or discuss them on the Arma Discord or on the Forums.
Only post proven facts here! Add Note

Posted on February 18, 2016 - 11:03 (UTC)
Fusselwurm: (to anyone else wondering, I took a minute to get it): This is Array.map() in JavaScript; Posted on February 11, 2018 - 23:02 (UTC)
Lou Montana: if performance really is an issue, apply seems to be (very) slightly faster than forEach (by more or less one percent, 0.7-1.5% in my tests to be precise).

@@ Line 25: / Line 25: @@
 |x4= <code>[0,1,2,3,4] [[apply]] {[[str]] _x}; {{cc|Returns ["0","1","2","3","4"]}}</code>
-| [[set]], [[resize]], [[pushBack]], [[pushBackUnique]], [[select]], [[reverse]], [[count]], [[find]], [[in]], [[forEach]], [[deleteAt]], [[deleteRange]], [[append]], [[sort]], [[arrayIntersect]], [[BIS_fnc_arrayPushStack]], [[BIS_fnc_arrayPush]]
+| [[set]], [[resize]], [[pushBack]], [[pushBackUnique]], [[select]], [[reverse]], [[count]], [[find]], [[in]], [[forEach]], [[deleteAt]], [[deleteRange]], [[append]], [[sort]], [[arrayIntersect]]
 }}